President Vjosa Osmani's request to the Constitutional Court to suspend the 30-day deadline for the constitution of the Assembly, which would also mean the interruption of sessions every 48 hours, does not seem to be able to help the impasse.
Osmani said that he made the request in order to prevent irreparable damage and protect the public interest, two criteria sufficient to issue such a measure, until it is clarified what happens after the deadline expires.
"No irreparable damage is being done to the Kosovo Assembly with these successive attempts that are being made, as the attempts are legitimate, regulated by the Assembly's regulations, but a political will and compromise are simply needed, as the Constitutional Court cannot impose the will of the deputies," Melos Kolshi from the IKL told A2 CNN.
In the first request filed by AAK, the Constitutional Court did not find it necessary to apply a temporary measure to prohibit the continuation of the constitutive session.
"The interim measure requested by the president contradicts the judgment, the decision of the Constitutional Court. This means that the judges of the Constitutional Court must demolish their own decision. This decision of the Constitutional Court is an order, it is a law, that is, for 30 days," Kadri Kryeziu, former Constitutional Court Judge, told A2 CNN.
There are also doubts about whether MPs have the right to gather after Saturday when the 30-day deadline ends.
"After the 30-day deadline, the deputies can again gather, they can try, and then if it is constituted after the 30-day deadline, someone can contest this decision and send it to the Constitutional Court," Melos Kolshi from IKL told A2 CNN.
The lack of legal consequences in the first Constitutional Court decision on the situation and the different reading of the same decision gave the parties the opportunity to not find a compromise and enter an unprecedented situation for the state of Kosovo. (A2 Televizion)