The chairman of the Liberal Democratic Union party, Arian Starova, commented in A2CNN's "Diary" on the proposal of the allies of the Democratic Party, of which he is a member, for the establishment of a federation, with the mission of uniting the opposition .
Asked if Sali Berisha will be the "leader" of this federation, Starova said that it is still too early to talk about decisions of this category, but revealed that the former prime minister remains in constant contact with the international factor.
Despite being declared non-grata by the USA and Great Britain, according to Starova, Berisha in every move she makes also evaluates the influence of these partner countries.
" Berisha is who he is, a man with a lot of experience and knowledge. It is the living history of all oppositionism in Albania. Maybe Berisha himself has other ideas as he is the man who knows very well the situation, the political situation and what needs to be done. Let's not forget something, Berisha is constantly, despite what it seems and is commented on, especially from the left wing, constantly in contact and connection with the international factor in Europe and America, in every move he makes. We look forward to any interesting ideas you may have. Non-grata is a mistake that has been made and a great state, like a strong man does not accept mistakes. Berisha, with its pros and cons, is a symbol of oppositionism. He has his role, he has made mistakes, he admitted them without question. But in no way is he corrupt and he is not corrupt, a man who has tried to kill opponents, etc., which are absurdities that no one should believe .
As for the initiative for vetting in politics proposed by the official DP led by Lulzim Basha, he said that it is "a terrible soap bubble".
" The initiative of vetting politicians seems to me a terrible soap bubble, completely unmotivated and excessive. Because all the mechanisms exist and if these mechanisms don't do the job properly, it's their fault. The question that is asked about the initiative that he has taken, but which I do not think is an appropriate initiative, is that if you ask for the vetting of politicians implying distrust in these institutions that you mentioned, then where do you place your faith that the vetting will be done by reliable people. It is his right to say any kind of idea even bordering on irrationality, but this idea does not apply .
(A2 Televizion)