He was released from the appeal, Malltezi reacts, tells how he defended himself in court

The son-in-law of former Prime Minister Sali Berisha, Jamarbër Malltezi, left the detention cell 1 month after his arrest by order of SPAK at Rinas airport.

The appeal of GJKKO decided this Tuesday to ease the security measure for Malltez, changing it from "prison arrest" to "house arrest", while for former prime minister Berisha, the security measure "compulsion to appear" remains in force, prohibiting him leaving the territory of Albania.

After the easing of the security measure, Malltezi did not react personally to the media, but former Prime Minister Berisha posted on the Facebook social network the entire speech of his son-in-law during the court session in Apel.

Berisha also commented on the decision of the justice for Malltez during the day, saying that this does not change his will to go to the International Court for Human Rights. 

" My son-in-law was a political prisoner and is a political prisoner. Malltezi was not released from prison, he was left under house arrest. This amounts to nothing. She would go to Strasbourg immediately. Millonai boldly expressed in the courtroom that corruption is consumed even with the implementation of the law ", declared Berisha.

MALTEZ'S WORD ON APPEAL:

I feel like I was in the political trials of 1945 where the landlords were the enemies of the people's power.

Think for a moment, if at the American Embassy, ​​the communist state would have placed a barrack or building, let in some usurper and not return the stolen item to the rightful owner, as it was returned in 1991. In 1991, should the thief or usurper state keep it, or not return it until it waits for the completion of the privatization procedures for the siege erected after the entry of the Popaj family into the embassy? Or would Ramiz take Alia and give him a concession to some strategic thief of Rama?

But why is there a political prosecution in the case of the return of the property to the 5 founding owner families of Tirana?

The owners, these 5 families, did not do any privatization process. The owners, these five families, were for almost 100 years, through the purchase of private land.

The process of property restitution is the return of stolen property. This process lasted from 1994 to 2007, when after dozens of decisions since 1995 (recognition of property and partial restitution), the stolen property was returned to the 5 owner families. In this property of the legal owners, 42 informal families were illegally introduced, who lived in the deplorable conditions where the multi-sport buildings were built, while the football club was used by a business, without any legal act or piece of paper with the state.

In order to enjoy the thing confiscated by the communist regime, after a 13-year ordeal, the noble owners were forced by the Law to buy the occupied barracks and buildings. So, not only did the state steal their property and keep it for 60 years without rent, but now the legal owners had to wait for over 2 years to buy those shacks that we didn't even need, and what's more, they were occupied. PRIVATIZATION WAS A PENALTIES TO THE OWNERS.

The owners were forced to pay nearly $700,000 for the occupied buildings at one club, as well as $100,000 for the other club. Compare it a bit with the price of 1 Euro with which Bolino received 4000 m2 of land and a 2-story building designated for a gymnasium, land which the owner families donated to the state to build a gymnasium.

1. This private property was developed by the owners respecting every law of the country, but also with humanity and respect for the community. They housed 42 informal families for free, got one of the prominent names of world architecture to conceptualize the area, such as Daniel Libeskind, made environmentally friendly constructions. If we had received client permission we would have built dormitories in steps to catch the sky and the sun, if there was money laundering we would have sold at a crazy price because we would have a lot of money to clean. But not us, the nobles of Tirana!

From our project, the public gained over 2000 jobs, millions of euros in taxes, the planting of 2000-3000 trees, the best garden/nursery in Tirana, environmentally friendly buildings, one of the areas with the cleanest air in the city, shrines for believers , the systematization of 42 informal families.

But how did this matter begin? See SPAK file Vol. 1, Page 97 (Taulanti's report has 2 stamps from SPAK in one day.)

- "SSSKAPE!" - Taulant Balla ordered SPAK 3 years ago, where there was pressure from journalists.

- "AS YOU ORDER!" - The response of the serving prosecutors within the same day they also register the report and the criminal proceeding 01.12.2020 the political prosecutors register a criminal proceeding, not an investigation!

Taulanti, by order of Edi Rames, filed a lawsuit in SKAP for illegal acquisition of property, which according to him had been expropriated by Italy, for illegal privatization and Berisha's illegal influence in this privatization.

3 years of investigations until the children of Malltez, carried out by the prosecutors serving Rames, and it turned out that Taulanti had filed a false report. The land of the 5 owner families continued to be clean in the Mortgage Registers even in 1943, 1945 & 1946. The Law of Restitution of Property of 2004, returned the land to the rightful owner, and made the privatization of buildings on private land a legal tax liability for the state to the land owners.

In addition to these, Taulanti made a false report for the taxing part of Malltez. SPAK confirmed Taulanti's false report, but is afraid to act.

Prof. Malltezi has been imprisoned for 1 month, although he is not even a subject of SPAK, while the one who is proven to have made a false report and is a subject of SPAK, passes under the noses of the political prosecutors with whom the threads of the criminalization of Taulant Balla are connected.

The duplicity of the prosecutors can also be seen with the recent cases: 100 million euros theft with sterilization and suspected "waste"; return of property to Mr. SPAK assigns suspicion to "corruption".

After the claim of expropriation came out and it was proven that the land belonged to 5 families, then the claim of reforms of the DP government began. Blame the laws & VKM. How dare the law return the stolen thing to the owner?

According to the prosecutors serving Rames, the land stolen from the owners should not be returned to the owner, but should be shared by Edi Rama for his friends.

Some prosecutors find it normal for Edi Rama to rob and divide 5.8 million m2 on the coast, but according to the command "SSSKAPE!", he should imprison the legal owners for the return of the stolen property.

Three inventories of the Municipality of Tirana in the 2000s, one of which with the signature of Edi Rama, state that all club facilities were forcibly occupied. 3 SP ministers, namely Angjeli, Klosi & Majko, started written communication in 2005 in favor of the beginning of privatization (at least the letters of Angjeli & Klosi), but SPAK hides these official letters; So let Rama's friends steal it, not the legal owners!

Three years of SPAK investigations confirmed that the owner families in the Mortgage Registers of 1945 and 1946 had over 67,000 m2 of land (Begeja 28,000 m2, Vaqarri 14,120 m2, Llagami 14,120 m2 - the 2 daughters of Ramazan Deli - and Alimehmeti with 10,560 m2).

Who was to enjoy this land bought with gold from the Tironse families? Thieving state? The usurper who was doling out corrupt officials? Or some strategic thief or strategic killer of Edi Rama?

Returning property to owners was a legal obligation, not just a moral one; is the return of the stolen item.

Political prosecutors insinuate that the return of the property was quick because it took 5 months in 2006-2007, but they hide the fact that the process lasted for 13 years and that in fact in March 2007 the decision was completed to complete the decision no. 532 dt. 25.04.1996 and that there were 2 other decisions, one taken in January 2006 by the KP Commission of the SP!

The public prosecutors of Taulanti seem to be worried why the PD government issued VKM laws, not for the five owner families, but acts that regulated the return of property to all, tens of thousands of legal owners. According to the political prosecutors, Berisha should not approve any VKM or law, since I am the heir of a Tironse owner family?

The same prosecutors do not care about the fact that Edi Rama has issued 3 VKM in the name of Carlo Bolino's company, only to wash 4000 m2 of land and a 2-story building specified in the Regulatory Plan for the gymnasium.

So according to them, Berisha, who has not approved any VKM by name, would have to block any return of property to the legal owners, while Rama is OK to donate land to Carlo Bolino, the Prosecutor's Son, in his own name. , to forgive the Port of Durrës, and to give the status of a strategic investor to his murderous friends with whom he dares.

Political prosecutors attack Berisha for the change of destination, but "forget" to show that the decisions about the change of destination were not made with the names of the owners. Moreover, the decision of the KRRTSH approved five decisions of the KRRT for the change of destination in five different areas, approved by Edi Rama (Decision no. 132/j dated 08.06.2006 of the Tirana KRT). At that time, KRTRSH did not change any destinations except those requested by the Municipality of Tirana. KRTRSH always approved what Edi Rama had approved. Except once in 2005, the KRTRSH overturned the decision of the KRTR of Tirana Municipality, directed by Edi Rama, and that was in the case of the Black Bird crossing. In that case, Edi Rama brought the head of the Local Authorities of the Council of Europe - (May 2006) who (Italian) described the decision of KRRTRSH as intervention of the central government in the local function of territory planning. Rama then brought these arguments to the Constitutional Court, which sanctioned on 12.12.2006, the right of the KRRT to approve its urban plans and the impossibility of the KRRTSH to annul the decisions of the KRRT. But even a month before this decision and before the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals for the approval of Edi Rames' decision to change the destination of the Partizani Club area, the Constitutional Court, with the decision 24/06, dated 10.11.2006, decided to cancel the change of the law for Urban Planning, which increased some powers of the prefect over the activity of KRRT, nullifying the legal consequences of these changes. Never again, except for the Black Bird case, did the KRTRSH intervene in the decisions of the KRRTs. So why did Rama change the destination in an area that had lost its sports function, is Saliu to blame?

Moreover, how was Berisha supposed to know whose family the land belonged to, that the destination would change, when Rame's letter did not mark it?

Political prosecutors then insult logic when they claim that the passage of VKM, in addition to an electoral promise for the use of securities, was made only to benefit Berisha's son-in-law. They relate this claim to the fact that, for one of the 2 clubs, the value of nearly $100,000, of which 20% was made in cash, and 80% in securities in accordance with an approved VKM. But, the political prosecutors "forget" that just one month before the passing of this VKM, the owner families had paid 100% in cash, almost $700,000, which was the calculated value of the facilities of the multi-sports club. If there was illegal influence, wouldn't the Begeja family and the other owners be able to wait one more month and pay the amount of 700 thousand dollars with privatization bonds? This defies minimal logic.

In addition, the Begeja family (whose heir I am proud to be), had almost 40% of the club facilities for which we paid $700,000, and only less than 5% of the club's only facility building. , for which $100,000 was paid. So out of 800,000 for the 2 clubs, I paid $720,000 in cash and $80,000 in bonds.

So much for this claim of the political prosecutors, who did not dare to interrogate either Berisha or me, because they had other orders.

Political prosecutors try to present it as if we got property through privatization, but in fact it is the return of stolen property. They try to present it as if it started with Minister Mediu, but they lie and hide letter no. 4533 Prot dated 21.07.2005 of Minister Angjeli, addressed to Ministers Majko and Klosi, with an official request for the initiation of the privatization procedures of the Partizani Club real estate.

A day later, with letter no. 2732 dated 22.07.2005 Minister Klosi agrees to the privatization of Partizani Club.

None of these 2 documents were included in the file of the political prosecutors, although I sent them attached to the lawsuit for false reporting of Taulant Balla, 3 months ago. Why?

Political prosecutors raise smoke with the area of ​​Partizani Club: whether it was 26,500, 28,000 or 30,000 m2. (A2 Televizion)